Henry V coursework ~ War criminal or Hero? Essay

Henry V is known as a perfect ruler and Shakespeare presents him as an extraordinary warrior. The author shows this by causing him to have helpful initiative characteristics just as having the option to identify with standard individuals. Henry pays attention to his duties very and is reasonable and just. The lord is profoundly strict, in any case, he can be savage. By and large Henry is viewed as a national legend. Initially, Henry has a scope of reasons why he proclaims war on France. I think the primary explanation is to follow his father’s guidance and join the nation. A case of this is on his deathbed and he says â€Å"busy thrilled personalities with remote quarrels†, this shows the nation needs joining together and to do this he should begin a war with an outside nation. The following explanation is to satisfy his progenitors and be celebrated like them. This is appeared by Canterbury when he states, â€Å"Invoke his warlike soul, your incredible †uncles, Edward the dark prince† and â€Å"Look back to your strong ancestors†. This shows he needs to satisfy his predecessors and be tantamount to them. Thirdly, Henry feels he has a solid case for the seat. For example, he believes he has a case in view of his incredible †grandma and goes to Canterbury to discover. He inquires as to whether he merits it, when he says â€Å"Justly and retigiously unfurl, why the salic law †¦. or then again ought to or ought not bar us in our claim†/Henry feels he has the privilege yet should be certain beyond a shadow of a doubt not to make a bogus case. He doesn’t need men’s lives on his inner voice. At that point another explanation is individuals anticipate that him should. An outline of this is when Exeter says, â€Å"your siblings rulers and rulers of the earth do all expect that you ought to stir yourself†. As a ruler he is relied upon to assume responsibility for his nation and guarantee what could be an extraordinary endeavor. Additionally, the congregation offers to pay. For instance, when Canterbury states, â€Å"In help where of we of the otherworldliness, will raise your Greatness such a forceful total, as never did the church at one time†. The congregation feel they should help pay and offer, so Henry doesn’t need to pay thus doing battle wouldn’t cost him anything. At last, the Dauphin affronts him by sending him a chest of tennis balls. The ruler has just chosen to do battle however this fair makes him increasingly decided. Henry’s voice is quiet and wry when he says, â€Å"we are happy the Dauphin is so wonderful with us†. As he says this, it gets stronger and stronger, working into a crescendo. He likewise delivers a discourse, where he is discussing war like a tennis match, utilizing illustrations. He additionally utilizes a great deal of redundancy now to accentuate what he is stating. This fair makes Henry significantly angrier convincing him to do battle. So by and large Henry has solid motivations to do battle with France. Nonetheless, before doing battle, Henry seeked guidance for the Salic law. This demonstrates he pays attention to his obligations very. Henry looks for counsel, as he doesn’t need to do battle without valid justification. The lord shows this when he is conversing with Canterbury as he says, â€Å"for never two such realms contended with out a lot of fall of blood, whose guiltless drops†. He advises Canterbury to be cautious since he doesn’t need an illicit war. Henry pays attention to this so as he doesn’t need his officers to lose their lives superfluously and doesn’t need their lives on his soul. Before that, Henry additionally leaves some portion of his military in England to make preparations for an intrusion from Scotland. This is shown when the lord goes â€Å"we must not just arm t’invade the French †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ against the Scots who will make street upon us with all advantages†. This shows Henry is playing it safe to shield his nation from all perspectives. Another case of Henry paying attention to his obligations is the point at which he executes his three companions Cambridge, Scroop, Gray and an old companion Bardolf. Henry executes Bardolf for instance to his men and to the French. It shows what sort of ruler they can anticipate. Henry executes Cambridge, Scroop and Gray as they were plotting to slaughter Henry as well as attempted to demolish everybody in England. This shows Henry isn’t hesitant to accept troublesome choices as they were his companions however executed them for his nation. Henry pays attention to his duties regarding his nation. Thirdly, in the contents of Henry V it shows Henry as a strict man, which persuades he isn’t a war criminal. To show that Henry is strict, Shakespeare utilizes steady references to God in his talks all through the play. Additionally Henry says to the French diplomat, who was sent to England with an offending endowment of tennis balls, that â€Å"we are no despot however Christian king†. This shows he is strict in his own eyes. What's more, Henry asks two clerics, Canterbury and Ely to clarify the salic law, which permits individuals to acquire the seat just through men and not ladies but rather Henry needs to acquire the French seat through his incredible †grandma which the French case is impossible. Henry approaches Canterbury and Ely for guidance and asks them â€Å"justly and religiously†, regardless of whether he can guarantee the French seat or not. All the more critically he needs to ensure he doesn't need his troopers lives on his still, small voice. Further more, the prior night Agincourt, Henry goes to God. He believes he needs to apologize for his father’s wrongdoing of killing Richard II and figures God may assume fault on his fighters and implores he doesn’t. He requests that God take care of him and his men’s lives and not betray them at fight. Later on, after the clash of Agincourt, Henry says thanks to God by saying â€Å"praised it be God and not our quality for it†. This shows he feels that without God they wouldn’t have won the fight. That their quality couldn’t have done it without assistance. Henry commits the triumph to God. Next explanation is that Henry is an uplifting chief. This is uncovered by the country’s response to war. For example while portraying the scene, melody states â€Å"now all the young people of England are on fire†. This outlines the nation is joining which was the counsel Henry was given by his dad on his deathbed. It is likewise appeared in Henrys discourses. In the discourse, Harfleur, Henry gives the men something to battle for as he converses with them like they are for the most part equivalent and causing them to recollect there fathers to battle on a par with them. The ruler reveals to them they will all become good examples for individuals who haven’t got boldness. Henry is communicating his trust in them. Henry utilizes comparisons like greyhounds are chasing the foes, which is the thing that the officers are never helping to French. Henry directly toward the end yells a rallying call, which motivates the men much more. By and large Henry was attempting to cause them to feel great about themselves dislike awful war warriors. In the discourse, Agincourt, Henry utilizes similar procedures in the Harfleur discourse. Henry utilizes an open presentation of certainty to help their mental fortitude. Henry tells his warriors that they will get a ton of wonder and that they will be recollected. He discloses to them they are largely equivalent and that they will all bond together. Henry in his discourse isn't driving them to do anything they don’t need. Henry reveals to them they are exceptionally uncommon. Henry works the discourse into a crescendo, getting stronger and stronger, causing the men to get progressively positive as it goes on. This does likewise impact as the Harfleur discourses making the men need to battle. Additionally, Henry shows others how its done. This appeared in the Agincourt discourse and the prior night, as when the lord was in camouflage he stated, ‘I myself understood the ruler state he would not be ransomed’. Additionally the ruler tells the Herald not long before the fight to disregard them as he would not be recovered. Just as that, Henry shares difficulties of his men as he causes them to feel all rise to. Henry feels and acts simply like them, regular humankind. This is appeared in the addresses and the prior night Agincourt, where he says ‘ I think the lord is nevertheless a man as I am’. Henry battles with his men and doesn’t kick back and watch. He believes he ought to go to fight aswel, making him and his men progressively equivalent. Additionally Henry is extremely reasonable and simply, this is appeared as the lord is answerable for the request and tranquility of his realm and Henry manages this accurately, as he gives the nation a steady and reasonable government. There are two instances of Henry maintaining the law. The first is appeared in the execution of Bardolph as Henry is working military law, no preliminary. He executes Bardolph as he ransacked a French church and he needs to set a guide to his officers and to the French. This is to show what sort of ruler he can be to the French residents. The subsequent model is the execution of Cambridge, Scroop and Gray. This is the place three companions of Henry attempt to imperil him and the entire nation, They get executed in light of the fact that they could destroy the entire nation, so the demonstration isn't of retaliation and he isn't utilizing the law as his private methods for retribution. The three backstabbers ask for kindness yet the ruler overlooks this, as he can't pardon somebody for doing a wrongdoing as everybody may begin doing it. Both of these choices are extremely hard for Henry to make as they are his companions yet he takes his duties and the law truly. This shows he is reasonable in giving equivalent treatment to everybody. All that I have referenced above are demonstrating Henry in a positive light and are acceptable attributes for a perfect ruler who pays attention to his obligations. Be that as it may, the opposite side to Henry, the savagery, doesn’t show him as a moving ruler. Henry does certain things in the play, which would be thought of as disputable today. Henry is exceptionally heartless. For instance, when Henry sets the snare for the three double crossers; Cambridge, Scroop and Gray. He play

charles robert darwin essays

charles robert darwin papers Darwin, Charles Robert (1809-1882), cientã ­fico britnico que sent las bases de la moderna teorã ­a evolutiva, al plantear el concepto de que todas las formas de vida se han desarrollado a travs de un lento proceso de seleccin characteristic. Su trabajo tuvo una influencia decisiva sobre las diferentes disciplinas cientã ­ficas, y sobre el pensamiento moderno en general. Nacido en Shrewsbury, Shropshire, el 12 de febrero de 1809, Darwin fue el quinto hijo de una acomodada y sofisticada familia inglesa. Su abuelo materno fue el prspero empresario de porcelanas Josiah Wedgwood; su abuelo paterno fue el famoso mdico del siglo XVIII Erasmus Darwin. Tras terminar sus estudios en la Shrewsbury School en 1825, Darwin estudi medicina en la Universidad de Edimburgo. En 1827 forsake la carrera e ingres en la Universidad de Cambridge con el blade de convertirse en ministro de la Iglesia de Inglaterra. Allã ­ conoci a dos influyentes personalidades: el gelogo Adam Sedgwick y el naturalista John Stevens Henslow. Este à ºltimo no slo ayud a Darwin a ganar confianza en sã ­ mismo, sino que tambin inculc a su alumno la necesidad de ser meticuloso y esmerado en la observacin de los fenmenos naturales y la recoleccin de especã ­menes. Tras graduarse en Cambridge en 1831, el joven Darwin se enlist a los 22 a de Henslow, para emprender una expedicin cientã ­fica al rededor del mundo. Su trabajo como naturalista a bordo del Beagle le di la oportunidad de observar variadas formaciones geolgicas en distintos continentes e islas a lo largo del viaje, asã ­ como una amplia variedad de fsiles y organismos vivos. En sus observaciones geolgicas, Darwin se mostr&oacut... <!

What Extent Is It Either Accurate Or Helpful To Situate Fundamentalism Essay

What Extent Is It Either Accurate Or Helpful To Situate Fundamentalism In Relationship To The Project Of Modernity - Essay Example Pat Robertson has impacted the fundamentalism through his 700 Club program in addition to his lawful association, his college and the politically inspired Christian Coalition, which he is the originator (Ruthven 30). This article talks about different parts of fundamentalism to uncover its advanced nature. The possibility that fundamentalism is hostile to present day can be seen in works by R. Scott Appleby and Martin Marty, Bruce Lawrence and Bruce Steve. Lawrence’s Defenders of God, Steve’s Fundamentalism and Appleby’s and Marty’s The Fundamentalism Project are key works in the artistic appreciation of fundamentalism. A larger part of researchers have comparative assessments concerning the relationship of innovation and fundamentalism. Fundamentalism is dependent on utilitarian components of innovation, while Lawrence (15), Steve (54) and Appleby and Marty (43) all see fundamentalisms as responses to the outcomes of illumination, which shows itself as in novator thinking or innovation. Fundamentalists restrict each individual or organization, which advocates for edification standards and bolster the pennants of innovation or secularism. Considering fundamentalism as hostile to current is amazingly incorrect, yet it is exact to arrange fundamentalism in relationship to the undertaking of innovation? ... Considering fundamentalism as against current is very wrong, yet it is precise to arrange fundamentalism in relationship to the task of advancement? Considering fundamentalism as hostile to present day jumbles its temperament and hints that it is ill-conceived comprehensively when it is, as a general rule, not for the cutting edge world. Hence, in the ceaseless capabilities of the relationship of fundamentalism to advancement, next to no is picked up. To talk about fundamentalism as a response to the innovator culture or advancement is to explain a muddled term through alluding to a constantly dubious term (Steve 30). Steve’s Fundamentalism gives the peruser a reason for this examination. In his examination, he raises various inquiries regarding the order of fundamentalism being hostile to present day and the degree to which fundamentalism could be specified to innovation. From a far, it is totally sensible to express that fundamentalisms of various types respond distinctively against the famous innovator culture. Nonetheless, experiencing the various strict developments, an individual can't be totally confounded by that announcement. Steve (51) likewise concedes that the expressions present day opposes clear definitions. In his composition, the meaning of present day is a code word for the whole powers of fundamentalists viewed as the danger that propels their reactions. Innovator conventions involve essentially three measurements contrary to fundamentalists: a loving towards common judiciousness; an acknowledgment of otherworldly resistance with strengthening propensities towards independence and relativism (Hoffmeister 15). Clearly, there are components of the advanced and common world, which pressure fundamentalists, dangers that each religion should resolve. In any case, does

Social Oppression On Caribbean - Free Essay Example

I can definitely put myself in the shoes of the lower and middle-class people of the Caribbean as I, myself am a native of Jamaica, where I lived and endured the harsh realities of a people who did not have much of anything. In regards to neoliberalism, I am totally against it as it only seems to suit the ruling and the upper class of people. In my view it allows a market that is free from any government regulation and rules and will contribute to the decrease in wages, employment and healthy work conditions as employers would have the liberty to abuse their power, raise prices and eliminate the concept the public good. This would only serve to fill the pockets of the upper class and further decrease the standard of living for the lower and middle In order to eradicate the social oppression from the Caribbean there needs to be a level playing field where the middle class and the lower class especially have a better chance of escaping their harsh realities and improving their status whether through educational opportunities, job opportunities and more resources deployed in the rural areas of the Caribbean communities. The middle class and the lower class have to receive the same chance as the upper class and the ruling class with disregard to demographic status, social status, financial status and even racial status. For example, social mobility is influenced by class in Caribbean societies even when educational attainment was taken into account. This has to change as people form the working-class background have less chance than those from higher working-class backgrounds of obtaining a position in one of the top classes even when they had the same level of educational qualifications. Who has the power in the Caribbean/ I think its quite obvious that the system of power is divided between the North American nations and channel from the Caribbean societys governments down to the upper-class people in those societies. The Ruling class (the government) and the upper class (the rich) design a system where the middle class and the lower class becomes dependable on them in order for the economic structure of the society to survive. This therefore creates an oppressive environment where the middle class and lower class is oppressed by the ruling class and the upper class who creates a false consciousness which persuades the members of those respective classes to believe that the social classes in which they belong to is natural and that it should remain that way. That develops in the cycle of the rich gets richer and the poor gets poorer. Conclusion The Lower Class: The majority of persons born into this social class never change their social status and when this occurs it is mainly because of a marriage. People of the lower class in the Caribbean societies have little or no control over production; they have very little resources, and little or nothing in the way of marketable skills, education or capacities. The Working Class: The working class, otherwise known as the middle class have little to no power in the Caribbean society. They make up an economy that was not designed to benefit them and are usually dependent on the government and the upper class in order to survive. Some of the people born in this social class elevate to the upper class or the ruling class through academic brilliance, luck or celebrity status but not enough to warrant a revolution. The Upper Class: The upper class in the Caribbean owns most of the private companies, the land, the wealth, resources and control the distribution of employment. These people contribute to ensuring that they remain rich while the middle class and the lower class remain in their respective class. These group pf people believe that in order to have a productive society there must be social inequalities. This group pf people have enormous power in the Caribbean societies, both politically and socially. The Government: I think the government represents the ruling class and maintains the power in the Caribbean. They are identified as the ruling class. In the Caribbean the market is saturated with suppliers of goods and services therefore making it easier for the upper class to have the upper say in whom belongs to what social class in society. The working class is oppressed by the ruling class. The working class and the lower class is oppressed by the ruling class who creates a false class consciousness which persuades members of the society to believe that the social class in which they belong to is natural and that it should remain that way. It certainly creates a false sense of freedom, especially in the economy where the market is literally controlled and regulated by the government but is promoted as a neo-liberal market. This group of people have total power in the Caribbean societies, in every department. A) North American Culture: Plays a major part in the structure of Caribbean societies since they adapt their way of life from North American societies. As a result of being influenced by the North American culture, the Caribbean societies tend to believe that they operate in a free market (neo-liberal) economy which sometimes results in conflict of interest between the working class and the upper class. Due to the contributions of the United States and other foreign countries, they hold major influence over the Caribbean societies, so much so that many past and present Prime Ministers are viewed as puppets for the North American nations.

The Bay Of Pigs Invasion - 1392 Words

Chapter 1 - The Bay of Pigs Invasion - 1961 Figure 1The above image is a primary source image of Fidel Castro (right) an infamous Cuban dictator, and Che Guevara who played a number of key roles within the Cuban government. This photo was taken in 1961, during which the Bay of Pigs Invasion took place. The photo was taken by Alberto Korda, a Cuban photographer. This photo allows us to peer into the past and see Castro presumably leading Cuban troops. There is a large possibility of bias when considering that the photographer that took this image, Alberto Korda, was not only Cuban but also a personal photographer and close friend of Castro. The Context: Date: April 17-19, 1961. The Decision Maker: both President Dwight D. Eisenhower and president John F. Kennedy. While President Eisenhower originally approved the plans to invade Cuba drafted by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) along with the U.S. National Security Council (NSC) on March 17, 1960, once in office President Kennedy allowed these plans to continue. It wasn t until April 4, 1961, that the legitimate Bay of Pigs plan was developed and approved by Kennedy. Along with this, the CIA made the very important decision of not informing President Kennedy that they possessed information claiming that the Soviet Union had heard word of an impending invasion. What was happening? After the Cuban Revolution (1952-1959) had taken place, Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista was forced out of power. Batista was then replacedShow MoreRelatedThe Bay of Pigs Invasion1313 Words   |  5 PagesThe Bay of Pigs Invasion Background The Bay of Pigs invasion of April, 1961 is considered to be one of the unsuccessful covert military invasions of the 20th century. In 1959, the Cuban revolutionist Fidel Castro overthrew the Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista through an armed conflict that lasted nearly five and a half years. Castro and his comrades were Socialists and they believed a Communist social system would better suit their nee. In order to fulfill this agenda, the new Cuban governmentRead MoreThe Bay Of Pigs Invasion1147 Words   |  5 PagesLouis Tullo Mrs. Forsyth U.S. History II 30 March 2016 Bay of Pigs Invasion Bays in pigs invasion is a cold war planned and fought by American president John F. Kennedy in an attempt to overthrow in early 1960’s. This came after Fidel Castro overthrew the then Cuban president Fulgencio Batista. The president was corrupt and had allies in the United States allowing the Americans to control the Cuban economy (Khan 21). The incoming Castro did the opposite by disapproving the Americans and resistedRead MoreThe Bay Of Pigs Invasion2240 Words   |  9 Pagescannot change the law of nature and they know it.† stated Allen Dulles, the fifth director of the Central Intelligence Agency. The Bay of Pigs Invasion was an encounter that occurred on April 17, 1961, between Cuban exiles, armed and trained by the American Central Intelligence Agency and the military forces of Fidel Castro. With the failure of the Bay of Pigs invasion the United States found itself more involved in the Cold War and experienced a new era in the military, political, and intelligen ceRead MoreThe Bay Of Pigs Invasion1652 Words   |  7 PagesThe purpose of the Bay of Pigs Invasion was to overthrow Fidel Castro as leader of Cuba and help stabilize the Cuban government. Fidel Castro started the MR-26-7, an anti-Batista group. At the time, Batista was the so called president and he claimed to be running a disciplined democracy.The people saw this as a dictatorship takeover. Castro ran the group as a clandestine cell system with ten members in each cell and they did not know the whereabouts or activities of the other cells. He was buildingRead MoreThe Bay Of Pigs Invasion1108 Words   |  5 PagesThe Bay of Pigs is an inlet of the Gulf of Cazones located approximately 97 miles southeast of Havana (Capital of Cuba). The Bay of Pigs Invasion is one of the United States biggest invasion fails in history. The invasion was meant to overthrow communist Cuba and bring Fidel Castro’s power to an end. This was obviously a fail, because as we now know, Fidel had be en in power until 2008, and now his brother Raul Castro is the president. The blame for this fail is on the Central Intelligence AgencyRead MoreAnalysis Of The Bay Of Pigs Invasion2708 Words   |  11 Pagesanalysis the Bay of Pigs invasion that occurred 17 April 1961, to use the Butterfly effect and to introduce Intelligence Platforms not utilized before and during the invasion, to suggest a alternate outcome to the invasion if these factors were applied properly or if other events never happened. The Bay of Pigs resulted in the failure to remove Fidel Castro from Power. If the CIA used Human Intelligence properly and if the U-2 Spy Plane program was not revealed to the World, the invasion may haveRead MoreThe Bay Of Pigs Invasion Of Cuba1036 Words   |  5 PagesThe Bay of Pigs Invasion of Cuba by the United States on April 17, 1961 was in the planning stages before John F. Kennedy became America s President. The plan was made by the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) during the Eisenhower years, and JFK supported the decision with modifications. Kennedy’s goal was to remove Fidel Castro from power of Cuba, cut his ties with the Soviet Union and establish a friendly government of the United States. He wanted the invasion to seem just plainly anti-CastroRead MoreThe Bay Of Pigs Invasion Into Cuba2257 Words   |  10 PagesThe Bay of Pigs invasion into Cuba can be seen as one of the most important political decisions in the history of the United States. Four months after John F. Kennedy took office as the thirty fifth President of the United States, he was blamed for the failed invasion of the Bay of Pigs. The failure was due to the lack of bad advice he received and then used to put into making his decision to invade. The decisions he made showed that the United States President and his Joint Chiefs were far fromRead MoreThe Invasion Of Cuba During The Bay Of Pigs2281 Words   |  10 Pagesunsuccessful invasion of Cuba at the Bay of Pigs, that is located on the southern coast of Cuba about 95 miles southeast of Havana, was one of miscommunication, mismanagement, and horrible execution (Bay of Pigs 378). The responsibility for the failed invasion falls right on the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) and a president by the name of John F. Kennedy. The intention of the invasion was to assault communist Cuba and put a halt to Fidel Castro. Ironically, 39 years after the Bay of Pigs, Fidel CastroRead MoreThe Cuban Missile Crisis : The Bay Of Pigs Invasion1272 Words   |  6 PagesProceeding to the Cuban Missile Crisis, American relationships with Castro were previously tense by the Bay of Pigs invasion (196 1) where the United States made an unorthodox action towards Cuba by financing and sending insurgent Cubans to help aid in overthrowing and attacking Castro’s supporters and Castro himself0000000. The Bay of Pigs was unsuccessful. This eventual lead to Castro’s joining with communist Soviet Union and leaving Castro cautious of American plans for Cuba. Castro’s suspicions

The Fall Of Major Telecommunications Company Onetel And Enron

OneTel and Enron were huge technology companies, dominating the competition that they faced although - everything changed. Both of these companies operated in the same era, coincedently both suffering financial collapse. The reasons were mainly because of failure to follow major accounting principles, lacking morals and lacking strong work ethics. If even a major corporation can fall into this â€Å"trap†, then avoiding doesn’t sound easy, although accountants can easily avoid scandals by following a precise set of given rules and ethics. OneTel and Enron are prime examples which demonstrate the danger when a business is faced with an accounting scandal - which in turn could have been avoided. The fall of major telecommunications company OneTel came as a huge shock, many fell victim to this. The fall of OneTel was caused by majorly flawed governance committee. â€Å"In the year 1999-2000 OneTel purchased over $520 million AUD on telecommunications licenses, ten times what corporate competitors Optus, Vodafone and Telstra spent in the past† (Barry, 2002). Here Barry explains the sheer magnitude of OneTel in it’s prime. Even though OneTel was positive by almost 700 million, the collapse was inevitable because of a majorly flawed governing circle. The post on Accounting Review shows that the flawed committee which OneTel relied on was not adequate, â€Å"On 19 April 2001, the company’s cash balance dropped to A$25 million. On 16 May 2001, the two joint-CEOs Jodee Rich and Brad KeelingShow MoreRelatedFinancial Collapse : The And Enron1320 Words   |  6 PagesOneTel and Enron were huge technology companies, dominating the competition that they faced although - everything changed. Both of these companies operated in the same era, coincedently both suffering financial collapse. The reasons were mainly because of the failure to follow major accounting principles, lacking morals and lacking strong work ethics. If even a major corporation can fall into this â€Å"trap†, then avoiding doesn’t sound easy, although accountants can easily avoid scandals by following

Is it Possible to Separate Law and Morality free essay sample

This essay illustrates that the separation of law and morality is both possible and impossible, depending on how one defines the phrase separation of law and morality. The essay explores the legal positivist separation thesis. It approaches the question of whether it is possible to separate law and morality from two aspects- first, the content of the law and secondly, the judicial decision making process. The writer makes reference to the policy of removing part-Aboriginal children from their families and communities, and placing them in special purpose institutions to support his argument. It has been described as ;arguably the most tragic and shameful chapter in Australia;s history.; From the late nineteenth century to the late 1960s, Australian governments carried out the policy of removing part-Aboriginal children from their families and communities, placing them in special purpose institutions. Often, these removals were carried out by force. The purpose of this removal policy was to assimilate the part-Aboriginals with the white community as the full-blooded Aboriginals were believed to be a doomed race in the sense that they would die out. We will write a custom essay sample on Is it Possible to Separate Law and Morality? or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page A large number of the children suffered physical and emotional mistreatment following the removal from their families. The children who were removed under this policy came to be known as ;the stolen generation This sets the backdrop against which I will discuss whether it is possible to separate law and morality with respect to the Australian courts law making power.4 The separation of law and morality is the foundation of legal positivism. Positivists often criticize natural law theorists for blurring the line between law and morals. This essay aims, by examining three stolen generation cases, to illustrate that the separation of law and morality is both possible and impossible, depending on how one defines the phrase ;separation of law and morality.